李隆盛Lung-Sheng Lee方瑀紳Yu-Shen Fang2019-09-032015-2-92019-09-032015http://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&s=id=%22GN0897710048%22.&%22.id.&http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/96943科技教育有核心任務不夠明確、角色定位不夠清楚等問題，可借重客觀的科技教育研究知識圖譜協助其辨清方向與前景。有鑑於此，本研究運用文獻計量學的共被引分析，針對WoS、Scopus、華藝三個資料庫，以每10年為一個階段，探究科技教育1970～2013年間中、英文研究文獻所涵蓋的子領域、流派、特性及未來發展趨勢。結果發現：(1)科技教育研究在國外呈現快速發展；國內則緩慢，兩者相較形成極大反差；(2)科技教育整合的學科領域主要是教育與教育研究、工程、電腦科學、社會科學和醫學學科領域；(3)研究主題演進從工藝、技職教育、科技素養教育與課程發展，演進到關注科技教師專業教學能力；(4)國外研究前沿趨向「科技教師」專業發展，國內則著重「課程與教材」；(5)不同時段獲致的集群具有互補作用，研究主題與研究前沿有延續現象；(6)科技教育研究較早出版的高被引用的經典文獻，書籍有23筆，期刊有27筆；(7)科技教育研究主要核心文獻，書籍有32筆，期刊有27筆；(8)研究構面「評估」向度尚未獲得國內外對應的重視。本研究結果可供科技教育研究人員檢視與更了解學科領域研究主題演進與研究前沿外，研究方法也可供相關學者參考。Technology Education (TE) has been confronted with the issues such as indeterminate core mission and unclear role. The issues can be alleviated by an objective knowledge map of TE research to discern the direction and prospects of technology education. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the sub-fields, genres, characteristics and trends of research literature on TE in either Chinese or English published in 1970~2013 through a co-citation analysis, which is a strand of bibliometrics. Three database, WoS, Scopus and AiritiLibrary, were investigated and every 10 years was selected as a period of discussion. Consequently, it is found as follows. (1) TE research has rapidly progressed in some countries other than Taiwan; (2) The disciplines integrated with TE are education and educational research, engineering, computer science, social sciences and medicine; (3) TE research topics have evolved from industrial arts, technical and vocational education, technological literacy education and curriculum development, to the pedagogical skills of technology teachers; (4) The international TE research front tends to be "technology teacher’s professional development”, while “curriculum and teaching materials” in Taiwan; (5) The TE research clusters in different periods are complementary and research topics and fronts act in continuation; (6) The high cited classical literature of TE published earlier, includes 23 books, and 27 journals; (7) The core literature of TE, includes 32 books, and 27 journals; (8) The research dimension of TE “assessment” has not yet been drawn necessary attention globally and domestically. The results of this study can not only help the stakeholders of TE to review and have better understanding of the evolution of research topic and research front, but also can serve as the research methods in the areas other than TE.研究前沿科技素養教育學科結構學科滲透知識演進research fronttechnological literacy educationdiscipline structurediscipline infiltrationknowledge evolution