黃忠慎2014-10-272014-10-272011-06-??http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/14536姚際恆與崔述、方玉潤並稱為清代獨立治《詩》三大家，三人三書都有強烈的批判性，其中尤以姚際恆《詩經通論》為最。姚際恆對於歷代的解《詩》成果都不滿意，愈是權威性的、典範性的著作，愈容易成為姚氏的批評對象，於是，完成於漢代的《毛詩》學派解詩系統－－《詩序》、《毛傳》、鄭《箋》成為姚氏首要推翻的《詩》學文本。本文分析姚際恆《詩經通論》的《詩》教觀及其反漢學色彩，歸結出姚氏批評《詩序》、《毛傳》、鄭《箋》的內容，也針對這些內容進行評論，最後並指出姚書解釋意涵中的漢學風味，以突顯出該書的一大特色。Yao Ji-Heng and Cui-Su, Fang Yu-run were called the three masters of Shijing in Qing Dynasty .They had the most independent spirit in their research .They had a strong critical character in their books, Yao Ji-Heng Shi Jing Tong Lun especially. The more authoritative and paradigmatic those works are, the more easily they tend to be the object of Yao Ji-Heng's criticism.In this paticular intepretation of the viewpoint, the Han Dynasty, Mao School representatives----Shi Xu,Mao Chuan,Zheng Jian, as the target that Yao Ji-Heng wanted to overthrow. In this thesis, we analyzed the view of moral education of Shi Jing and the anti-Han school feature of Yao Ji-Heng, generalized and remarked the work of Yao's criticizing Shi-Xu,Mao-Chuan,Zheng-Jian. In the end we pointed out the Han school savor of the intention in Yao's explanation,in order to highlight the clearest character of Yao's book.姚際恆《詩經通論》《詩序》《毛傳》鄭《箋》Yao Ji-HengShi Jing Tong LunShi XuMao ChuanZheng Jian