吳清基教授潘慧玲教授宋雯倩2019-08-282013-09-302019-08-282013http://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&s=id=%22GN0896000147%22.&%22.id.&http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/90329本研究以文件分析研究大陸地區高等教育學歷採認政策制定歷程中政策的演進、決策脈絡、意涵及發展，並藉由Kingdon多元流程理論、Sabatier倡議聯盟理論、Fairclough與Foucault的論述分析概念，瞭解進入學歷採認政策文本中的各方利益競逐之爭議點與影響決策的策略、決策因素與其決策模式、支持反對政策開放各方論述與政府決策之脈絡考量，並根據上述研究結果提供後續政策發展方向供相關單位參考。 研究結果發現： 一、學歷採認政策歷經三位總統任期，政策之窗於馬總統時期開啟。 二、學歷採認決策爭議點中國家整體利益優先於其他利害關係人利益。 三、利害關係人利用各種管道影響政策。 四、保護主義與反保護主義的論述影響大陸高等學歷採認。 針對本研究結果，後續建議： 一、陸委會在規劃整體方向、綜整各部會意見應提供適時的溝通與裁示，提供主要負責部會應有的支持與協助，並成立一中立、穩定且長期的研究單位。 二、教育部針對實施情況應定期檢討修正，逐步放寬採認範圍、逐漸放鬆不予採認規定，讓各大學校院得以依自身特色招收適合的學生與教師，以發展自身學校的特色。另外不論在學術合作或招生經營等各面向上，皆必須全盤考量因應，不能再侷限於重點大學或少數學校上。 三、未來研究可持續關注大陸高校發展或其他階段各級教育，或運用其他研究取徑與方向進行研究，以更完善大陸高等教育學歷採認政策之面貌。This research conducted with document analysis was to understand the progression, decision context, connotation and development of the policy process regarding recognition of Mainland China’s higher education in Taiwan. Using framework of Kingdon’s multi-stream theory, Sabtier’s advocacy coalition theory, concept of Fairclough’s and Foucault’s discourse analysis, the researcher tried to pinpoint (1) the controversial issue raised by interest groups, (2) the influential decision-making strategies, factors and models, (3) the discourses for/against the opening-up policy. Additionally, these research results served as references for further studies and as suggestions of revisions in the agenda, formulation and implementation of policy. There are four research results: 1.The policy had been formulated and adopted during three presidents’ terms, but not until when President Ma starts his office is it implemented. 2.The controversial issues revealed that the national interest is prior to other interest groups. 3.The interest groups affected policy decision by all means 4.The discourses of protectionism and anti-protectionism affected the policy process. Based on these results, the suggestions are as below: 1.Mainland Affairs Council is advised to provide communication platform and timely instruction with necessary supports and assistance while planning a comprehensive cross-strait plan and integrating suggestions among Ministries. It is also advised to set a neutral, stable and research institution with long-term development. 2.Ministry of Education is advised to regularly review and revise whether implementation is proceeding well, then to ease restrictions to allow universities to recruit talents in accordance with their features. Furthermore, MOE should carry out a comprehensive plan when dealing with academic cooperation or recruiting, but not merely focusing on key universities. 3.Further studies are advised to concentrate on the development of higher or other levels of education in Mainland China, or to apply alternative theory frameworks in order to study and complete this policy.大陸地區高等教育學歷採認政策歷程higher education of Mainland Chinarecognition of educationpolicy process