黃美金博士齊莉莎博士Dr. Lillian M. HuangDr. Elizabeth Zeitoun施姵如Cindy Peiru Shih2019-09-032008-7-212019-09-032008http://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&s=id=%22GN0694210269%22.&%22.id.&http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/97701本研究旨在探討萬大泰雅語各種疑問句之句法結構及語調類型。萬大泰雅語屬於泰雅語中澤敖利語 (C’uli’) 的一支，主要分布於南投縣仁愛鄉境內。本文將萬大泰雅語疑問句型依據其詢問訊息、形成方式及語調三方面的差異，區分為四類，即是非問句、附加問句、選擇問句及訊息問句。 在句法結構方面，我們指出（一）是非問句可藉由其相對直述句的句末兩音節語調之改變而形成；（二）是非問句亦可藉由疑問詞ya’ 之出現在句首而形成，然而附加問句的疑問附加語 ’aw 則須出現在句尾；（三）選擇問句可分析為兩個是非問句的並聯結構，其中第一個是非問句經由改變音調形成，第二個則以疑問詞ya’ 起首，此外，萬大泰雅語選擇問句只允許前向刪除 (forward deletion)；（四）訊息問句中的疑問詞依其構詞句法特徵可區分為疑問名詞和疑問動詞，而根據這些疑問詞在句中的分布，萬大泰雅語應歸屬為選擇性前置 (optional-fronting) 的語言，並呈現主語感應 (subject-sensitive) 現象。 針對萬大泰雅語各種疑問句型的語調現象，我們探討以下幾個議題：（一）音節結構、重音形式及性別和語調的關聯性；（二）疑問詞 ya’ 和疑問附加語 ’aw 對是非問句和附加問句語調及語調下降終止 (downdrift suspension) 現象的影響；（三）謂語／非謂語的差異和選擇問句中ya’ 的語調表現之相關性；（四）疑問詞音節結構與疑問詞出現在句中的位置對訊息問句語調之影響。另外，我們也整理出萬大泰雅語語調的四種主要功能：（一）區辨不同的語言行為，例如直述句與是非問句；（二）區辨不同疑問句型；（三）衍生各種疑問句型的非疑問用法，例如不定詞、修飾問句、驚嘆與遲疑；（四）使說話者於詢問時能同時表達態度上的暗示，例如威嚇、強調或厭煩。This thesis investigates both the morphosyntax and intonation of interrogative constructions in Plngawan Atayal, a C’uli’ Atayal dialect spoken in Ren-ai Township, Nantou County. In the study, four types of interrogative sentences are identified, including yes-no questions, tag questions, alternative questions and information questions. They differ from each other in terms of the piece of information being inquired, strategies being used, and intonation contours. With respect to the morphosyntax of interrogative sentences, it is pointed out that (i) most yes-no questions are formed via contour modification that occurs within the last two syllables of declarative sentences, (ii) yes-no questions may also be formed by means of the question particle ya’ that occurs sentence-initially, while the question tag ’aw in tag questions has to appear sentence-finally, (iii) alternative questions are analyzed as the juxtaposition of a phonologically-marked yes-no question and a ya’-initiated yes-no question; besides, only forward deletion is allowed in Plngawan, and (iv) interrogative words used to form information questions may be divided into interrogative nouns and interrogative verbs based on their morphosyntactic characteristics. In terms of distribution of interrogative words, Plngawan Atayal is classified as an optional-fronting language that observes the subject-sensitive constraint. Intonational phenomena of various interrogative sentences are also investigated, including (i) relations among syllable structure, stress pattern, gender and contour modification of yes-no questions, (ii) influences of ya’ and ’aw on contours of yes-no and tag questions as well as the phenomenon of downdrift suspension, (iii) influences of the predicate/non-predicate distinction on intonational behaviors of ya’ in alternative questions, and (iv) influences of syllable structure and position in a sentence of interrogative words on contours of information questions. Furthermore, it is found that intonation in Plngawan may exhibit at least four functions: (i) distinguishing among various illocutionary forces, e.g. to turn a statement into a yes-no question, (ii) differentiating among types of interrogative sentences, (iii) deriving non-question readings of interrogative sentences, e.g. indefinite, rhetorical question, exclamation and hesitation, and (iv) enabling speakers to express attitudinal implications while asking questions, e.g. threatening, emphasis and impatience.疑問句結構萬大泰雅語台灣南島語言是非問句選擇問句附加問句訊息問句構詞句法語調選擇性前置主語感應限制重音形式語調下降終止Interrogative constructionsPlngawan AtayalFormosan languagesyes-no questionsalternative questionstag questionsinformation questionsmorphosyntaxintonationoptional frontingsubject sensitive constraintstress patterndowndrift suspension