賴貴三Lai, Kuei-San黃湟凱Huang, Huang-Kai2022-06-072021-02-012022-06-072021https://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/thesis/detail/29d036b6886f6ea823f2bcaddf46d6a2/http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/116477本文以國立臺灣師範大學圖書館藏章宗源著、金蓉鏡批校《隋經籍志考證》為研究對象，進而處理兩項議題，其一：考證金蓉鏡的生平行事與學術特質；其二，分析金蓉鏡批校《隋經籍志考證》在目錄學史上的價值與地位。 金蓉鏡的生平行事貢獻，並不表現在為官生涯上，而是在參與地方事務、維護地方利益上。學術著述方面四部均有，且有刻印叢書；學術特質方面，值得重視者有二：方志學與金石學。方志學方面，重視古今地方文史的考察，除修訂過去的志書，更應在新撰的志書體例上求取進步。金石學方面，著重金石作為出土文獻、可用於考證傳世文獻的作用。個人藏書方面，種類不乏精鈔善本，且大方捐贈藏書以建立圖書館，為藏書家中所罕見者。 《隋經籍志考證》中金蓉鏡的批校（下稱「金批」）可從批校內容，以及引用文獻二方面來考察。批校內容部分又可分為增補與逕改二方面，增補方面有輯錄佚文、流傳梳理、增補書目、異同辨析四項；逕改方面指出了章宗源其書的諸多訛誤，可做為校勘使用。其批校思想與一般目錄學著作針對單一文獻向外考察的做法不同，可能源自於高似孫「聚類相從」的模式，加上金蓉鏡本身「採摭遺文」的基調，著重性質或內容近似之文獻的關係。 引用文獻方面，金批利用了一百一十種文獻，無論就橫向類別、或是縱向時間的跨度上都非常廣泛。外部根據時間、地理因素，內部基於行文、卷數差異，推測在版本上，金批可能使用了《文瀾閣四庫全書》與《徑山藏》，其餘則有叢書本、輯佚本等種類。至於文獻的利用方式，是以正史類、時間上近隋的文獻，逐漸向外擴展，並旁及小說、雜史等非正式紀錄。 其價值與缺失，由於金批並非以成為架構完整、體例嚴謹的著作為目的，故偶有理解錯誤、引據瑕疵、批校重出等缺失。理解錯誤多表現在句讀的誤讀，引據瑕疵則是引據不明，批校重出則是因文字重出導致互相矛盾之處。 本文藉由考證金蓉鏡之生平，及分析金蓉鏡批校《隋經籍志考證》之價值，期望能夠對延展目錄學研究史的時間下限，並試圖對資訊工程「主題搜索」、圖書資訊「館藏推廣」二方面，達到啟發的作用。This thesis takes the rare book “Sui Jing Ji Zhi Kao Zheng” written by Zhang, Zong-Yuan, critiqued by Jin, Rong-Jing in the Library of National Taiwan Normal University as the research object. The purpose is to deal with two issues. First, research on Jin, Rong-Jing's life and academic characteristics. Second, Analyze the value and status of Sui Jing Ji Zhi Kao Zheng critiqued by Jin, Rong-Jing in the bibliographic history. Jin, Rong-Jing’s contribution is not manifested in his career as an official, but in participating in local affairs and safeguarding local interests. Academic writing cover four categories, and there are engraved series books. In terms of academic characteristics, there are two worthy of attention: Local Records and Epigraphy. First, he attaches great importance to the study of ancient and modern local literature and history. In addition to revising the past books, he should also make progress in the style of new books. Second, he emphasis on the role of inscriptions as unearthed documents that can be used for textual research and handed down documents. His collection of books has many excellent editions, and he generously donated books to build a library, which is rare among book collectors. Jin, Rong-Jing’s Critique on Zhang, Zong-Yuan's Sui Jing Ji Zhi Kao Zheng can be explored from two aspects: content and references. The part of content can be researched in two aspects: addition and modification. The part of addition has four aspects: collect missing text, reveal the history of circulation, add bibliography, distinguish bibliographic differences. The part of modification has pointed out many errors in this book, which can be used as a collation. His Critiquing thinking is different from the general bibliographic works method of investigating a single document outward. It may be derived from Gao, Si-Sun's form of "gathering similar categories", and Jin, Rong-Jing’s own thought of "collecting scattered words", emphasizing the relationship between documents with similar nature or content. In terms of citing documents, he used 110 kinds of books. It covers a wide range of categories and time. Externally depended on time and geographical factors, internally based on differences in text and volume, it is speculated that Jin, Rong-Jing may have used "Siku Quanshu of Wenlan Pavilion" and "Jingshanzang" in terms of version, while the rest are in series and lost editions. As for the way he used the literature, he used the official history books, which are close to the Sui Dynasty, gradually expanded outward, alongside informal records such as novels and miscellaneous histories. Its value and deficiencies, because his critique does not aim to become a well-structured and rigorous work, there are occasional deficiencies such as misunderstandings, flaws in citations, and repeated text. Comprehension errors are mostly manifested in sentence segmentation errors, quotation flaws are due to unknown sources, and repeated texts are contradictions caused by repeated text. This thesis examines Jin, Rong-Jing’s life, and analyzes the value and quality of his critique, on “Sui Jing Ji Zhi Kao Zheng”, hoping to extend the time limit of the bibliographic research history, and try to promote the"subject search" of information engineering and the "collection promotion". On the two sides, it has the effect of enlightening.章宗源金蓉鏡《隋經籍志考證》善本清代目錄學ZhangZong-YuanJinRong-Jing“Sui Jing Ji Zhi Kao Zheng”rare booksbibliography of Qing Dynasty