Untitled
| dc.contributor.author | Kim-Su Rasmussen | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-16T08:01:19Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-05-16T08:01:19Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-03-?? | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper analyzes the exchange between Ricoeur and Derrida concerningmetaphor. I argue that the exchange is not a “missed encounter,” as EftichisPirovolakis has suggested, but exemplifies a hermeneutic situation in whichtheoretical divergence is supplemented by a practical convergence. Rather thana mere exegesis of the exchange between Ricoeur and Derrida, I emphasize thepractical implications for the interpretation of poetic metaphors. To be morespecific, I emphasize the case of Paul Celan’s poem “Blume” and the semanticdensity of the central metaphor. Although Ricoeur and Derrida diverge in strictlytheoretical terms, their theoretical positions—when translated into practicalterms—establish different but convergent paradigms for the interpretation ofpoetic metaphors | en_US |
| dc.identifier | C362450B-DF33-E44B-A463-8C207B944524 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/116251 | |
| dc.language | 英文 | |
| dc.publisher | 英語學系 | zh_tw |
| dc.publisher | Department of English, NTNU | en_US |
| dc.relation | 45(1)，17-41 | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | 同心圓：文學與文化研究 | zh_tw |
| dc.subject.other | Paul Ricoeur | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Jacques Derrida | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Paul Celan | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | metaphor | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | hermeneutics | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | deconstruction | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | Divergent Convergent:Ricoeur, Derrida, and Metaphor | zh_tw |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- ntnulib_ja_B0205_4501_017.pdf
- Size:
- 397.97 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format