Corpus-based Lexical Semantic Study of Verbs of Doubt

dc.contributor.author劉美君zh_tw
dc.contributor.authorMei-chun Liuen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-27T15:39:50Z
dc.date.available2014-10-27T15:39:50Z
dc.date.issued2002-06-??zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本文藉由觀察語料庫中「懷疑」和「猜」的語法表現,來界定此二動詞的語意區別。並利用「模組屬性」的表徵模式,將二者在事件結構及參與角色上的細部內涵表 達出來。「懷疑」和「猜」均屬低認定度的認知動詞,「懷疑」甚至可出現否定某論述的用法。在事件結構上,「猜」屬動作性的事件,可有進程,可有結果。「懷 疑」則屬狀態性的事件,可描述認知狀態的變化。本文試圖將詞彙語意的區別化約為可清楚界定的語意屬性。zh_tw
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the semantic differences between the near-synonymous pair in Mandarin – ca#i and hu⇔aiy⇔i. As verbs of doubt, they are similar in marking weak epistemic assertion but differ in event structure and presuppositional strength. The analysis is based on collocation patterns of the two verbs displayed in the Sinica Corpus. A Module-Attribute representational framework is adopted in this paper for detailing the semantic distinctions.en_US
dc.identifier5768B5B3-02D8-0F70-2374-108799AA3CA0zh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/23376
dc.language英文zh_TW
dc.publisher英語學系zh_tw
dc.publisherDepartment of English, NTNUen_US
dc.relation28(2),43-55zh_TW
dc.relation.ispartofConcentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguisticsen_US
dc.subject.other詞彙語意zh_tw
dc.subject.other動詞語意zh_tw
dc.subject.other中文動詞zh_tw
dc.subject.other猜疑類動詞zh_tw
dc.subject.otherLexical semanticsen_US
dc.subject.otherVerbal semanticsen_US
dc.subject.otherMandarin verbsen_US
dc.subject.otherVerbs of doubten_US
dc.titleCorpus-based Lexical Semantic Study of Verbs of Doubtzh-tw
dc.title.alternative中文認知動詞「懷疑」和「猜」的詞彙語意探討zh_tw

Files