A study on CSL proficiency evaluation—Reading and Listening subject.

dc.contributor國立臺灣師範大學應用華語文學系zh_tw
dc.contributor.authorRih-Chang Chaoen_US
dc.contributor.authorBor-Chen Kuoen_US
dc.contributor.authorHsuan-Po Wangen_US
dc.contributor.authorYa-Hsun Tsaien_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-30T09:26:56Z
dc.date.available2014-10-30T09:26:56Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-01zh_TW
dc.description.abstractPresently there are many Chinese proficiency tests (CPTs) available today measuring participants’ proficiency in CSL. Most of them, the AP Chinese language and Cultural examination (AP), Hanyu Shuiping Kaoshi (HSK) and Test of Proficiency-Huayu (TOP), had classified their test results in proficiency levels which corresponded to the levels of CEFR (The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, and Assessment). However, some of Reading and Listening subjects in Top had not completely conducted their proficiency level in corresponding to CEFR. Therefore, the items implemented in this study were on the basis of CEFR for CSL CPT reading and listening subject construction. This study applied IRT 3PL model to analyze and interpret 751 reading and 762 listening subjects empirical data collected from Grace Christian Collage in Philippine on September 2009 via the computerized based test (CBT). The contribution of this study was not only on the construction of a CSL Proficiency Test on a basis of CEFR but also in comparison with examinees’ proficiency scales in referring to their background and explored factors that might affected CSL learning effectiveness.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.naun.org/multimedia/NAUN/educationinformation/19-554.pdfzh_TW
dc.identifierntnulib_tp_H0101_01_003zh_TW
dc.identifier.issn2074-1316zh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/31280
dc.languageenzh_TW
dc.publisherNAUNen_US
dc.relationInternational Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 5(1), 51-58.en_US
dc.subject.otherCEFRen_US
dc.subject.otherChinese as Second Languageen_US
dc.subject.otherProficiency Testen_US
dc.subject.otherCSL proficiency scalesen_US
dc.titleA study on CSL proficiency evaluation—Reading and Listening subject.en_US

Files

Collections