大學生對MOOC課程的評估
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2016
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
在線上課程的帶動下,MOOC成為新興的教育趨勢。近年來各國及國內均投入許多資源在MOOC課程發展上,以提升課程品質。雖目前有一些幫助提升品質之指標,但較偏重課程與教學設計者的觀點,尚未從學習者的觀點發展評估MOOC課程的指標與研究。
本研究發展了給大學生使用的MOOC課程評估指標,並邀請大學生對於四門MOOC課程做評估。根據學生填答的數據了解學生對於四門MOOC課程的評估,且由訪談資料了解學生對於課程的想法。
本研究提出了一個可供大學生評估MOOC課程的指標,評估指標由四大規範(課程說明、課程教材、討論與回饋及測驗與作業)和24項指標組成。請大學生使用發展的 MOOC課程評估指標評估現有的MOOC課程,發現四門課程均未達到「符合」之程度。
本研究發展了由學習者評估MOOC課程的指標,也實際邀請大學生使用評估指標對現有的MOOC課程進行評估,但因參與之大學生只有某科技大學的少數學生,評估指標及大學生對MOOC課程的評估結果尚不足以證明評估指標的應用性,建議後續研究繼續修訂指標及擴大大學生的參與人數,以建立大學生適用的MOOC課程指標。
Developing indicators and criteria using college students’ point of view and inviting twenty-two students to assess four MOOC courses, this study intended to develop usable MOOC assessment indicators/criteria and to understand college students’ assessing of existing MOOC courses. . As a result, this research developed four indicators (Course Descriptions、Course Materials、Discussion and Feedback、Tests and Assignments )with 24 criteria . Using those criteria to assess the selected MOOC courses, it was found that the attributes of MOOC courses did not closely meet the criteria. The usability of the criteria and the reliability of students’ assessment couldn't be adequately proven in this study because of the few sample size. It is suggested that more researchesis needed to validate the usability of the assessment indicators and criteria, and that a more appropriate conceptual framework being built to guide the study of MOOC course pre-assessment (before the course is open to the students).
Developing indicators and criteria using college students’ point of view and inviting twenty-two students to assess four MOOC courses, this study intended to develop usable MOOC assessment indicators/criteria and to understand college students’ assessing of existing MOOC courses. . As a result, this research developed four indicators (Course Descriptions、Course Materials、Discussion and Feedback、Tests and Assignments )with 24 criteria . Using those criteria to assess the selected MOOC courses, it was found that the attributes of MOOC courses did not closely meet the criteria. The usability of the criteria and the reliability of students’ assessment couldn't be adequately proven in this study because of the few sample size. It is suggested that more researchesis needed to validate the usability of the assessment indicators and criteria, and that a more appropriate conceptual framework being built to guide the study of MOOC course pre-assessment (before the course is open to the students).
Description
Keywords
磨課師, 課程評估指標, 大學生, MOOC, Course Indicators, Course pre-assessment