輝格史觀與教育史解釋

dc.contributor國立臺灣師範大學教育學系zh_tw
dc.contributor.author周愚文zh_tw
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-02T06:34:32Z
dc.date.available2014-12-02T06:34:32Z
dc.date.issued2007-03-01zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本文旨在檢討歷史解釋中輝格史觀的「進步史觀」與「以今論古觀」兩種涵義,及其在國外教育史研究上曾出現的缺失,然後透過個人近年五項研究案經驗的分析,重新反省其得失,最後提出日後運用上的限度。zh_tw
dc.description.abstractThe main purpose of this paper is to reconsider the Whig Party’s interpretation of history and to review two key connotations of this interpretation, i.e., progressivism and presentism. Revisionist historians and historians of education since the 1960s have criticized certain kinds of historical writings. However, based on personal research done in the past few years, the author here reconsiders the rationality of the revisionists’ critique. Finally, the author revises the judgment of “whiggishness” and agrees that the viewpoint of progressivism and presentism could be used in the study and interpretation of the history of education, under certain conditions and limitations.en_US
dc.identifierntnulib_tp_A0103_01_026zh_TW
dc.identifier.issn1028-8708zh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/38177
dc.languagezh_TWzh_TW
dc.publisher 國立臺灣師範大學教育學系zh_tw
dc.relation教育研究集刊,53(1),1-20。(TSSCI)zh_tw
dc.subject.other輝格史觀 zh_tw
dc.subject.other 進步史觀 zh_tw
dc.subject.other 以今論古觀 zh_tw
dc.subject.other 教育史 zh_tw
dc.subject.other 教育史學zh_tw
dc.subject.otherWhiggishness�en_US
dc.subject.otherrogressivism�en_US
dc.subject.otherresentism�en_US
dc.subject.otheristory of education�en_US
dc.subject.otheristoriography of educationen_US
dc.title輝格史觀與教育史解釋zh_tw

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ntnulib_tp_A0103_01_026.pdf
Size:
622.44 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections