Two Notes on the Chinese bi Comparatives

dc.contributor.author劉辰生zh_tw
dc.contributor.authorChen-Sheng Luther Liuen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-27T15:15:14Z
dc.date.available2014-10-27T15:15:14Z
dc.date.issued2012-05-??zh_TW
dc.description.abstractInstead of jumping into the debate on whether the Chinese bi comparative is a clausal or a phrasal comparative, I argue for the following two points concerning this construction. First, the marker bi is not a degree word; instead, it functions to introduce the standard and forms a pair of correlative words with a degree adverb with the meaning of comparison. Second, the standard introduced by bi cannot be elements that can be modified by a degree adverb; otherwise, a conflict between two dimensions of comparison will occur.en_US
dc.identifierC27149A1-5131-FEC6-9C8A-99D7FF581DB6zh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/13306
dc.language英文zh_TW
dc.publisher英語學系zh_tw
dc.publisherDepartment of English, NTNUen_US
dc.relation38(1),69-91zh_TW
dc.relation.ispartof同心圓:語言學研究zh_tw
dc.subject.otherbien_US
dc.subject.othercorrelative worden_US
dc.subject.otherdegree worden_US
dc.subject.otherdimension conflicten_US
dc.titleTwo Notes on the Chinese bi Comparativeszh-tw

Files

Collections