公民治理與社會發展的課題分析與參考架構-以高雄地區1989-2011的環境管理、都會治理、兩岸交流與公共事務教育為例-五都新制後的高雄市都會治理

Abstract

子計畫四題目：五都新制後的高雄市都會治理 無論是邁向全球城市、或是厚實地方制度的安排，行政區域改制的治理是一個 主要的權力途徑；同時，尺度治理的重構也是臺灣在全球架構下發展變動的新挑 戰。本子計畫四《五都新制後的高雄市都會治理》，係根據公民治理參考架構就高 雄市都會治理課題進行分析。運用社會判斷理論及互動管理的實驗方法，進行決策 者主觀認知與客觀事實之整合分析。首先，就觀念性層次而言，透過深度訪談分析 多元當事人對於高雄市都會發展與都會治理現況之認知。再透過資訊整合理論求取 多方當事人群體動態(社會平均)的模式，以建構與個體權重的衡量求取。並且，運 用社會判斷理論之多元迴歸及修正透鏡模式的實驗方法，探討受測者（治理決策者） 個體在多元社會中對於公共決策的認知判斷、瞭解程度以及確認學習效果。其次， 就實證性層次而言，透過第一手資料的收集，探討高雄市都會治理策略、規劃與體 制的課題觀點與制約因素。並且，進一步針對多方當事人個體對於高雄市都會發展 規劃的判斷認知（實務操作互動管理），以作為跨域治理分析。最後，依前述分析 結果，檢視高雄市都會治理結構與執行績效問題，就政策行銷與地區行銷策略提出 策略性建議。

Topic: Metropolitan Governance of Kaohsiung after the Restructured Five Special Municipalities The governance of the reformed administrative areas, the reorganization of specific kinds of social interaction at a higher scale and over a wider terrain, is a primary avenue to power, no matter whether it is towards a global city or local thickness of institutional arrangements. Also, it is a new challenge to Taiwan’s dynamic development under the framework of globalization. This research project aims to deal with the Kaohsiung metropolitan governance puzzles that are based on civil governance theoretical framework. In the light of public governance, this study is going to conduct experimental methodologies upon the Social Judgment Theory (SJT) and Interactive Management (IM) to the integrative analyses over the decision-­‐makers’ subjective cognitions and objective facts. Firstly, for conceptual level, this research attempts to elucidate the action situations and cognitions of governance by face-­‐to-­‐face in-­‐depth interviews to the decision-­‐makers and related stakeholders. The following exercise of the Information Integration Theory (IIT) aims to tackle the dynamic model of multiple groups (social average) to construct a measure with the weight of the individual policy-­‐makers. Moreover, to apply the experiments of SJT and Lens Model Equation (LME) to explore the decision-­‐making and remaking cognitive judgments, recognition, and learning in a pluralistic society is then elaborated. Secondly, on the empirical level, via the first-­‐hand data collection, this research then follows to decipher Kaohsiung metropolitan governance in the issues of strategies, planning and institutional arrangements and their limits. An inter-­‐disciplinal judgment and cross-­‐territorial governance upon the commons of metropolitan development and planning, as the operational interaction management, can be therefore scrutinized. Finally, and accordingly, this study by looking into the governance structure and policy performance, can positively propose place-­‐marketing strategies to Kaohsiung both in history-­‐embedded and geography-­‐ specific significances.