Evaluating proposals for experiments: An application of Web-based self- and peer-assessment

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2003-09-01

Authors

Sung, Yao-Ting
Lin, Chen-Shan
Lee, Chi-Lung
Chang, Kuo-En

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Abstract

Thirty-four undergraduates used Web-based self- and peer-assessment procedures for evaluating proposals in experimental psychology courses. Students presented their proposals and commented on the proposals of others on the Web. Results indicated that proposal observation and peer interaction enhanced the quality of students' proposals. These procedures also enhanced the interrater reliability of within-group members' proposal ratings.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By