Evaluating proposals for experiments: An application of Web-based self- and peer-assessment
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2003-09-01
Authors
Sung, Yao-Ting
Lin, Chen-Shan
Lee, Chi-Lung
Chang, Kuo-En
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Abstract
Thirty-four undergraduates used Web-based self- and peer-assessment procedures for evaluating proposals in experimental psychology courses. Students presented their proposals and commented on the proposals of others on the Web. Results indicated that proposal observation and peer interaction enhanced the quality of students' proposals. These procedures also enhanced the interrater reliability of within-group members' proposal ratings.