Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: On a Environmental Philosophy
Other Titles: 環境的哲學觀
Authors: 榧根勇
Issue Date: Nov-2007
Publisher: 地理學系
Department of Geography, NTNU
Abstract: 地球暖化顯示近代(modernity)非合理性的明確證據。近代將結束,近代哲學的支柱是笛卡兒(Rene’ Desccartes)的二元論,那是忽視人心對自然的效應,腦科學、認知科學、生命科學、火箭工學等,明示過去約十年的科學證實,笛卡兒的二元論有基不 合理處。後近代哲學是非二元論,為了近代新哲學的說明,列舉Ken Wilber的萬物理論,Erin Laszlo的AKasic(資訊)場,清水博的偏在性生命,中田力的腦理論等要點。基於新哲學提出新環境哲學。為了提安的新環境哲學應用的可能性採用 Wilber的四象限架構,對中國雲南省麗江古城的環境問題實施現地調查,最後對不發生環境問題的後近代「次社會system」的建構所必要的模式加以考 察。
Global warming is the decisive evidence indicating the irrationality of modernity. Modernity is drawing to a close. Cartesian dualism has been the philosophy for modernity, but it neglected the role of nature for creating human mind. New scientific findings during the past ten years or so in brain science, cognition science, life science, robotics etc. made clear that Cartesian dualism is difficult to accept. New philosophy for post-modernity is non-dualism. As examples of new philosophy, the essence of Ken Wilber’s theory of everything, Ervin Laszio’s Akashic (information) field, Hiroshi Shimizu’s omnipresent life, and Tsutomu Nakada’s brain theory are explained. On the basis of the new philosophy, a new environmental philosophy for post-modernity is proposed. We made a field work on environmental problems in Lijiang, Yunnang Province, China by applying the Wilber’s four quadrants framework in order to show the applicability of the proposed new environmental philosophy. Finally, morals necessary for building “the next social system” without environmental problems in post-modernity is discussed.
Other Identifiers: 702A6FC4-5FAC-7A23-614A-C4592A231656
Appears in Collections:地理研究

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.