Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Other Titles:||A Comparison of Teaching Eeffect on Learning Through Cognitive learning in Physical Education|
Office of Research and Development
|Abstract:||The study was conducted during the First Term of 1981. Subjects were 80 male students at the Ho-ping Junior High School, Taipei. According to their Pre-class test results, they were divided homogeneously into 4 groups. Each group received 3 weeks "Basketball Set-Shot" instruction. The teaching methods were:group I: Students were given instructions, demonstration and clue of feed-back.groupII: Students were given instructions, demonstration, However with no clue of feedback. groupIII:Students were given instructions, however with no demonstraction and clue of feedback.grpupIV:Nothing of above mentioned were given.The Purpose of the present research was to investigate:1. The variance from results of teaching Physical Education between cognitive learning and non-cognitive learning.2. The variance among the various Physical Education teaching methods.3. The variance from pre-class test to post-class test of 4 kind of Physical Education Teaching methods.The data were subjected to Analysis of Variance and Posterion Comparisons Newman-Keuls Method. Along with a detailed analysis and discussion, the study drew the following conclusions.1. Teaching Physical education with cognitive learning was signifi-cantly superior to non-cognitive learning (p<.01).2. Teaching Method I was significently superior to Teaching. Method II (p<.01)and superior to Teaching Method III(p<.05)3. Teaching Method II was superior to Teaching Method IV(p<-05)4. Although each teaching method has its strength and weakness, Yet by companing the results of Pre-class test and Post-class test it is found each teaching method have considerable im-porvement(p<.01).|
|Appears in Collections:||師大學報|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.