Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Study on Actual Operation of Taoyuan County Teacher Grievance Committee
Teacher Grievance system
Teacher Grievance Committee
due process of law
This research aims at analyzing what problems the Taoyuan County Teacher Grievance Committee confront and submitting suggestions based on research conclusions for the education competent authorities to adopt them as the reference for rectifying Teacher Grievance Committee organization and evaluation principles. For reaching the aforesaid purposes, the literature review method and in-depth interview were adopted as the research methods for this research. The literature review method was used that the Teacher Grievance Committee organization development history and how Committee functions were explored by reviewing relevant documents and the current regulations and acts are used as the theoretical basis for this research. The in-depth interview was adopted for completely exploring the current status and what the real problems are where the interviewees are current or former members of the Teacher Grievance Committee, including the competent authorities’ representatives, scholars, experts, internal staff, teachers’ representatives and plaintiffs’ representatives amounting 15 in total. The self-edited interviewframework is used as the research instrument for combining interview and analyzing relevant data as the basis for conclusions and suggestions. The conclusions for this research are as below: 1.Composition of the commission shows high percentage of teachers that are not concurrently serving in the administrative position. 2.Inadequate proper legal procedure standard. 3.The effect of the decision by the commission often is not clear enough, which makes it difficult for implementation. 4.Selection of multi-track reliefs channel wastes national litigation resources and affects the efficiency of reliefs. 5.Due to the promotion in the awarness of teachers rights,and making good use of the teacher grievance system and assurance of teachers rights. 6.Teachers do not have much faith in teacher grievance system. The suggestions for the competent authorities’ executives taking into reference according to the research results are as below: 1. To reduce the members of teachers who do not concurrently serve in the administrative position. 2. It is suggested that the review regulation article 32 shall be amended. Penalty regulations shall be enacted for demanding the competent authorities’ executives to be fully responsible. 3. It is suggested that Ministry of Education shall establish higher-level Commission or regulation Commission to centralize law interpretation and to solve dissenting opinions. 4. The competent authorities shall conduct the Teacher Grievance cases compilation in the county as soon as possible. 5. The law propaganda and case-study seminars shall be conducted. Keywords: Teacher Grievance system, Teacher Grievance Committee, due process of law
|Appears in Collections:||學位論文|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.