Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/84966
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor張媁雯zh_TW
dc.contributorWei-Wen Changen_US
dc.contributor.author莊雅婷zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYa-Ting Chuangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T02:00:05Z-
dc.date.available2008-7-27
dc.date.available2019-08-28T02:00:05Z-
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifierGN0695740065
dc.identifier.urihttp://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&s=%22http://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&s=id=%22GN0695740065%22.&%22.id.&
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/84966-
dc.description.abstractWith the tread of globalization, there is an increasing need to have an instrument to evaluate whether expatriates possess the necessary cross-cultural competence. Thus, the purpose of the study was to develop a Taiwanese version of the Cross-Cultural Adaptability Inventory (CCAI) by adopting back translation and examining the reliability and validity of the CCAI on Taiwanese sample. This study was based on a purposive sample containing 372 valid responses from three major groups: participants in the trade center of Taiwan, graduate students in the international trade/business master program in Taiwan, and trainees joining the Taiwan overseas volunteers orientation. A rigorous translation procedure with back translation, peer review, expert review, and pilot test as well as reliability and validity examination was conducted. The results were listed in the following: 1. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the scale, Personal Autonomy, was .55, below the standard .70. Besides, its composite reliability, .39, didn’t pass the suggested value ,.60, as well, indicating high measurement error variance. 2. The results of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated mediocre fit of the four-factor structure: RMSEA (.08), SRMR (.08), GFI (.70), CFI (.67), and NNFI (.66). 3. Five items of which t values were smaller than 1.96 indicated no significant relations between the measured variable and its corresponding factor. Possible explanations of the low reliability coefficient for Personal Autonomy and the mediocre fit were discussed. Also, the recommendation for cross-cultural research and the Cross-Cultural Adaptability Inventory were suggested.zh_TW
dc.description.sponsorship國際人力資源發展研究所zh_TW
dc.language英文
dc.subject跨文化適應力檢核單zh_TW
dc.subject翻譯對等zh_TW
dc.subject跨文化適應力zh_TW
dc.subjectCross-Cultural Adaptability Inventoryen_US
dc.subjectTranslation Equivalenceen_US
dc.subjectCross-Cultural Adaptabilityen_US
dc.title跨文化適應力檢核單:中文版信效度之研究zh_TW
dc.titleAn Examination of Chinese Version of the Cross-Cultural Adaptability Inventoryen_US
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
n069574006501.pdf639.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.