Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
|dc.description.abstract||It has long been an unwritten rule that individuals are responsible for the development of their personal moral character. However, the way in which people typically develop moral character is often the result of habits and moral upbringing, which are imposed before individuals start to shape their moral character by conscious effort. Ifthis is the case, an individual should not be held completely responsible for his or her own moral character. This paper draws on the idea of “ moral luck" to designate non-voluntary variables such as one's background, circumstances, upbringing, temperament, and other similar factors, which one cannot control but which can have substantial influence on the formation of moral character. Moral luck and its challenge to the notion that one must always be responsible for his or her own moral character helps to clarify the degree to which one should be held responsible for his or her own moral character. This paper concludes that the formation of moral character is not entirely under the control of an individual. Instead, it can be impacted by a wide varietyof conditions; the formation of one's character cannot be solely accomplished by the nature of one's individual actions, but is rather a collaborative process. Lastly, this paper specifies how one can take responsibility for his or her own character based on an Aristotelian developmental conception of voluntariness and personal responsibility.||en_US|
|dc.publisher||Department of Education,National Taiwan Normal University||en_US|
|dc.subject.other||responsibility for character||en_US|
|dc.title.alternative||Can an Individual Be Held Responsible for His/Her Own Personal (Moral) Character: How Moral Luck Challenges the Notion that Individuals Are Responsible for Their Own (Moral) Character||zh_tw|
|Appears in Collections:||教育研究集刊|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.