Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/81787
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author黃庭康zh_tw
dc.contributor.authorTing-Hong Wongen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-12T05:08:47Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-12T05:08:47Z-
dc.date.issued2016-09-??
dc.identifier29F9F45E-7AF9-A201-F560-367CC93D9CCB
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/81787-
dc.description.abstract伯恩斯坦(Basil Bernstein)的教育機制理論假設學校主要是透過教學溝通實 踐打造意識型態,進而達到社會再生產的效果。但此理論之出發點忽略了教育體 系的社會篩選作用,有礙學者們思考學校的生活機會分配功能對教育機制運作的 可能影響。把學校教育簡單地視為溝通傳意機制,也導致伯恩斯坦假設評估規則 只是協助教學機制落實教育論述的手段,忽視了在具體的學校與教育體制中,考 評往往是社會篩選與淘汰的重要機制。這些侷限引致伯恩斯坦沒有考慮到評估規 則可以透過控制有價值的教育機會與社會位置的分配來左右教育機制的運作。本 文試圖突破伯恩斯坦的限制,指出當考評具備社會篩選功能時,評估規則較能幫 助落實教育論述。為了審視評估的社會篩選功能,筆者進一步發展伯恩斯坦的理論,提出評估規則包含了時間、後果與區辨三大次規則,並強調掌權者可透過三個評估次規則調控社會篩選的過程與結果,進而落實意識與權力再生產。筆者並以新加坡華文中學考試改革的歷史案例說明此論點。zh_tw
dc.description.abstractBernstein’s theory of the pedagogic device assumes that schools perform a reproductive function through communicative practices that shape consciousness and identity. This assumption neglects that schools also help perpetuate power relations through functioning as an apparatus of social selection. Because of this skewed emphasis, Bernstein considers evaluative rules purely as a device to help realize pedagogic discourse and overlooks that in the concrete contexts of education systems, evaluations are most often instantiated as summative assessments that function as distributors of valuable life opportunities. This theoretical blind-spot of Bernstein has prevented scholars from discovering the implications of schools’ social selection functions for the operation of the pedagogic device. Using the historical example of state examination reforms on Chinese middle schools in the late-1950s to the early- 1960s, I seek to fill this gap. I contend that assessments can help actualize official pedagogic discourse more effectively when they also exert profound impacts on allocation of valued social positions and educational opportunities. My contention is illustrated by the case of postwar Singapore, where the ruling regime had more success in replacing the Sino-centric pedagogic discourse of Chinese institutions with a more Singaporean-centered one after state-run exams targeting students’ futures in education and employment were imposed.en_US
dc.language中文
dc.publisher國立臺灣師範大學教育學系zh_tw
dc.publisherDepartment of Education,National Taiwan Normal Universityen_US
dc.relation62(3),73-104
dc.relation.ispartof教育研究集刊zh_tw
dc.subject.other伯恩斯坦zh_tw
dc.subject.other國家教育政策zh_tw
dc.subject.other教育機制zh_tw
dc.subject.other評核與考試zh_tw
dc.subject.other新加坡zh_tw
dc.subject.otherBasil Bernsteinen_US
dc.subject.otherstate education policyen_US
dc.subject.otherpedagogic deviceen_US
dc.subject.otherassessment and examinationen_US
dc.subject.otherSingaporeen_US
dc.title重探伯恩斯坦的教育機制理論:以新 加坡華文中學的國家改革考試為例zh-tw
dc.title.alternativeReevaluating Pedagogic Device: The Case of State Examination Reforms in Singapore, from the Late-1950s to the Early-1960szh_tw
Appears in Collections:教育研究集刊

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.