Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/31709
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor國立臺灣師範大學華語文教學系暨研究所zh_tw
dc.contributor.authorChen, J.-Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCherng, R.-J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-30T09:27:47Z-
dc.date.available2014-10-30T09:27:47Z-
dc.date.issued2013-08-09zh_TW
dc.identifierntnulib_tp_H0404_01_010zh_TW
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078zh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/31709-
dc.description.abstractIn spoken word production, a proximate unit is the first phonological unit at the sublexical level that is selectable for production (O'Seaghdha et al., 2010). The present study investigated whether the proximate unit in Chinese handwritten character production is the stroke, the radical, or something in between. A written version of the form preparation task was adopted. Chinese participants learned sets of two-character words, later were cued with the first character of each word, and had to write down the second character (the target). Response times were measured from the onset of a cue character to the onset of a written response. In Experiment 1, the target characters within a block shared (homogeneous) or did not share (heterogeneous) the first stroke. In Experiment 2, the first two strokes were shared in the homogeneous blocks. Response times in the homogeneous blocks and in the heterogeneous blocks were comparable in both experiments (Experiment 1: 687 vs. 684 ms, Experiment 2: 717 vs. 716). In Experiment 3 and 4, the target characters within a block shared or did not share the first radical. Response times in the homogeneous blocks were significantly faster than those in the heterogeneous blocks (Experiment 3: 685 vs. 704, Experiment 4: 594 vs. 650). In Experiment 5 and 6, the shared component was a Gestalt-like form that is more than a stroke, constitutes a portion of the target character, can be a stand-alone character itself, can be a radical of another character but is not a radical of the target character (e.g., � in , , , ; called a logographeme). Response times in the homogeneous blocks were significantly faster than those in the heterogeneous blocks (Experiment 5: 576 vs. 625, Experiment 6: 586 vs. 620). These results suggest a model of Chinese handwritten character production in which the stroke is not a functional unit, the radical plays the role of a morpheme, and the logographeme is the proximate unit.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00517/fullzh_TW
dc.languageenzh_TW
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundationen_US
dc.relationFrontiers in Psychology, 4 : 517.en_US
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00517zh_TW
dc.subject.otherChineseen_US
dc.subject.otherhandwritingen_US
dc.subject.otherplanning uniten_US
dc.subject.otherproximate uniten_US
dc.subject.otherword form encodingen_US
dc.titleThe proximate unit in Chinese handwritten character production.en_US
Appears in Collections:教師著作

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.