Skip to main content
Communities & Collections
All of DSpace
Statistics
English
العربية
বাংলা
Català
Čeština
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
Suomi
Français
Gàidhlig
हिंदी
Magyar
Italiano
Қазақ
Latviešu
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Português do Brasil
Srpski (lat)
Српски
Svenska
Türkçe
Yкраї́нська
Tiếng Việt
Log In
Log in
New user? Click here to register.
Have you forgotten your password?
Home
師資培育與就業輔導處
師資培育與就業輔導處
Permanent URI for this community
http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/13
Browse
Search
Subcommunities and Collections
By Issue Date
By Author
By Title
By Subject
By Subject Category
Search
Subcommunities and Collections
By Issue Date
By Author
By Title
By Subject
By Subject Category
1 results
Back to results
Filters
Author
search.filters.author.蔡菁芝
Subject
search.filters.subject.憲法164條
1
search.filters.subject.教科文預算
1
search.filters.subject.教育經費
Browse subject tree
Has files
1
No
Reset filters
Settings
Sort By
Accessioned Date Descending
Most Relevant
Title Ascending
Date Issued Descending
Results per page
1
5
10
20
40
60
80
100
Search
Author: search.filters.author.蔡菁芝
×
Subject: search.filters.subject.憲法164條
×
Search Tools
Search Results
Now showing
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Item
論憲法164條不應凍結
(
師資培育與就業輔導處
,
1999-04-??
)
蔡菁芝
Show more
憲法164條的凍結,在我國有一定程度的爭議,而且贊成與反對「凍結」該一條文的學者、專家彼此之間有不同的看法;但是卻無清楚的論辨,至為可惜。贊成凍結者認為憲法中教科文預算比例下限的規定,不啻是一種特權、產生預算排擠效應,並且有礙國家整體資源之合理分配與運用,又造成消化預算等浪費情形;同時對行政權與立法權造成限制,所以應該予以凍結。此外,贊成凍結此一條文者也認為教科文預算的多寡和憲法的保障與否並無必然的關係;甚至認為此次凍結提案全由民間推動,並經國大代表通過,亦即符合民意與程序。還有「保障」已無時代意義,而且是一種恥辱,凡此種種,皆認定憲法164條應該凍結。本文以贊成凍結者的理由為經,個人的研究心得當緯,分就上述意見一一探究,認為憲法164條不應凍結。
Show more