文學院

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/2

院成立於民國44年，歷經50餘年的銳意發展，目前設有國文、英文、歷史、地理、臺文等5個學系、翻譯和臺灣史2個獨立所，以及全球華人寫作中心和國際臺灣學研究中心。除臺史所僅設碩士班，其餘6個系所均設有碩、博士班；目前專兼任教師近250人，學生約2500餘人。

本院早期以培養優秀中學國文、英文、歷史和地理教師為鵠的，臺灣中學語文和史地教育的實踐與成功，本院提供不可磨滅的貢獻。近年來，本院隨師範體系轉型而調整發展方向，除維持中學師資培育的優勢外，也積極朝理論研究和實務操作等面向前進。目前，本院各系所師培生的教師檢定通過率平均在95%以上；非師培生在文化、傳播、文學、應用史學及環境災害、地理資訊系統等領域發展，也已卓然有成。

本院各系所教師的研究能量極為豐富，參與國內外學術活動相當活躍。根據論文數量、引用次數等指標所作的學術力評比，本院居人文領域全國第2名。各系所之間，無論是教師的教學與研究，或學生的生活與學習，都能相輔相成、榮辱與共，彼此渾然一體，足堪「為師、為範」而無愧。

News

系所網址：http://www.cla.ntnu.edu.tw/main.php

Browse

Filters

20111

Settings

Has files: NoSubject: search.filters.subject.Jacques Derrida

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    檔案書寫：麥可‧翁達傑《分離》的倫理研究
    (2011) 陳煒婷; Wei-ting Chen
    《分離》可視為麥可‧翁達傑寫作上的轉折。不同於以往關注政治及身分認同的議題，翁達傑在這本小說著重人與人之間的隱私及親密關係。著迷藝術表現的可能性及正史未說的部分，翁達傑慣於挑戰寫作的傳統及僭越未知的歷史。本文將就翁達傑的寫作風格及主題來探究《分離》中甚少被談及的倫理面向。築基於德希達的「檔案熱」(archive fever) 及列維那斯的倫理思維，筆者意欲解析小說女主角─安娜如何透過檔案書寫來回應他者的呼喚並以此轉移個人的創傷經驗。 第一章論及人們對過去的迷戀及現代身分認同政治。筆者援引德希達的「檔案熱」，企圖檢視安娜對史料的狂熱與她創傷經驗及身分危機之間的關係。第二章的討論側重於安娜尋找歷史中被消音他者的過程。本章的理論架構倚重理查‧福爾摩斯(Richard Holmes) 與蘿拉‧馬庫絲(Laura Marcus) 的論述。筆者認為透過寫作，安娜與其寫作對象之間產生了立即性及互為影響的力量。在這過程，安娜不只為歷史他者留下紀錄；相反的，他者也將喚醒安娜壓抑的過去。然而，唯有透過寫作，安娜才能間接地面對與檢視她與家人之間斷裂的關係。第三章的探討重點為檔案書寫的倫理觀。筆者挪用列維那斯的倫理論述探究安娜如何藉由回應他者的呼喚面對並了解過去的創傷。此外，透過書寫，安娜得以重新思索自我與他人的關係並建立新的倫理主體。 關鍵字：麥可‧翁達傑、德希達、檔案熱、檔案書寫、書寫他者、列維那斯、 倫理、創傷主體、《分離》
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Untitled
    (英語學系, 2016-03-??) Shawn Normandin
    Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice opposes Darcy, a character closely associated with writing, to Wickham, one associated with speech. Elizabeth Bennet’s earlyprejudice in favor of Wickham and against Darcy—by extension, in favor of speech and against writing—is, among other things, an example of what Jacques Derrida calls phonocentrism. Her prejudice is as much a literary necessity as a moral defect, since Austen has ensnared her in a phonocentric allegory. After the unfolding of Darcy’s letter, the novel complicates the allegory, empowering Elizabeth, who, in her final argument with Lady de Bourgh, triumphantly exploits the fact that speech can function like writing. The novel does not replace phonocentrism with its opposite, a prejudice in favor of writing; rather, it shows how both speech and what we commonly call writing depend upon arche-writing. The novel stages its own retroactive detachment from the media prejudice it exploits.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Untitled
    (英語學系, 2016-03-??) Shawn Normandin
    Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice opposes Darcy, a character closely associated with writing, to Wickham, one associated with speech. Elizabeth Bennet’s earlyprejudice in favor of Wickham and against Darcy—by extension, in favor of speech and against writing—is, among other things, an example of what Jacques Derrida calls phonocentrism. Her prejudice is as much a literary necessity as a moral defect, since Austen has ensnared her in a phonocentric allegory. After the unfolding of Darcy’s letter, the novel complicates the allegory, empowering Elizabeth, who, in her final argument with Lady de Bourgh, triumphantly exploits the fact that speech can function like writing. The novel does not replace phonocentrism with its opposite, a prejudice in favor of writing; rather, it shows how both speech and what we commonly call writing depend upon arche-writing. The novel stages its own retroactive detachment from the media prejudice it exploits.